Könyv Judicial Deliberations Mitchel De S.-O.-L'E. Lasser

Judicial Deliberations

A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy

Nyelv: Angol
Kötés: Puha kötésű
Elérhetőség: 50 % esély
Keressük az egész világon
25 215 Ft
Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassat...

Információk a könyvről

Nyelv
Angol
Kötés
Könyv - Puha kötésű
Kiadva
2009
oldal
402
EAN
9780199575169
ISBN
0199575169
Enbook ID
04533331
Súly
584
Méretek
236 x 159 x 27

Teljes leírás

Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed comparative examination of the interpretive practice of the European Court of Justice. Lasser demonstrates that the French judicial system rests on a particularly unified institutional and ideological framework founded on explicitly republican notions of meritocracy and managerial expertise. Law-making per se may be limited to the legislature; but significant judicial normative administration is entrusted to State selected, trained, and sanctioned elites who are policed internally through hierarchical institutional structures. The American judicial system, by contrast, deploys a more participatory and democratic approach that reflects a more populist vision. Shunning the unifying, controlling, and hierarchical French structures, the American judicial system instead generates its legitimacy primarily by argumentative means. American judges engage in extensive debates that subject them to public scrutiny and control. The ECJ hovers delicately between the institutional/argumentative and republican/democratic extremes. On the one hand, the ECJ reproduces the hierarchical French discursive structure on which it was originally patterned. On the other, it transposes this structure into a transnational context of fractured political and legal assumptions. This drives the ECJ towards generating legitimacy by adopting a somewhat more transparent argumentative approach.

Érdekelheti

3 171 Ft

Never Wake

Kira Cul'tofay
2 832 Ft

Haddock Or Halibut?

Alice Adamson
5 512 Ft
61 830 Ft
10 908 Ft
4 932 Ft
12 592 Ft

Azok a vásárlók, akik ezt a könyvet megvásárolták, a következőket is megvásárolták

Spiegelbilder

Michael Eisner
6 146 Ft

Abrázame, mamá

María Luisa Ferrerós
3 100 Ft

Deutsche Heldensagen

Richard Weitbrecht
22 156 Ft
2 747 Ft