Könyv Knowledge Production and Indonesian Capitalism Inaya Rakhmani

Knowledge Production and Indonesian Capitalism

Szerző: Inaya Rakhmani
Nyelv: Angol
Kötés: Kemény kötésű
Elérhetőség: Könyvújdonság
Küldés 09. 02. 2027
52 247 Ft
This book examines how knowledge is produced in Indonesia and how its state research agencies, unive...

Információk a könyvről

Szerző
Nyelv
Angol
Kötés
Könyv - Kemény kötésű
Kiadva
2027
EAN
9789819264599
Enbook ID
53773914
Méretek
148 x 210

Teljes leírás

This book examines how knowledge is produced in Indonesia and how its state research agencies, universities, and civil society organisations came to work as they do. It treats intellectual work as a form of labour, organised by the class relations and forms of capitalism in which it is embedded. It argues that educational and research institutions have been terrains on which competing class projects and different forms of knowledge production have taken shape.

The book traces this history across the development of Indonesian capitalism. It begins with the colonial origins of Indonesian knowledge production, when an anti-colonial intelligentsia emerged within institutions built to sustain colonial rule, while Javanese aristocrats consolidated as a bureaucratic rather than a landed elite. Under developmental authoritarianism, intellectual labour was increasingly bound to the project of national development, particularly after the destruction of the Indonesian left in 1965, as statist ambitions combined with foreign-trained technical expertise and military power. After authoritarian rule ended in 1998, market competition was layered onto the bureaucratic and oligarchic arrangements that survived, while national competitiveness emerged as an increasingly important language through which changes in knowledge production were organised and legitimised. Later chapters examine state research, universities, and civil society in turn, showing how each was reconfigured under these changing conditions and how the work of their knowledge workers became increasingly precarious. The book concludes by asking whether this growing precarity might also provide the basis for an alternative knowledge politics connecting critical knowledge workers more closely with the social groups their work addresses.