Wie sinnvoll ist die deutsche Wissenschaftssprache fur das Textverstandnis?

Name: Wie sinnvoll ist die deutsche Wissenschaftssprache fur das Textverstandnis?
Brand: Grin Publishing
SKU: 9783656511489
Price: 6232 HUF
Availability: InStock

Szerző: Christian Riedl

Nyelv:

Kötés: Puha kötésű

Kiadó: Grin Publishing

Elérhetőség: Beszállítói készleten

Küldés 5-8 napon belül

6 232 Ft

Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2013 im Fachbereich Germanistik - Linguistik, Note: 1,0, Universität Wien...

Információk a könyvről

Szerző

Christian Riedl

Nyelv

Német

Kötés

Könyv - Puha kötésű

Kiadva

2013

oldal

EAN

9783656511489

ISBN

3656511489

Enbook ID

02168736

Kiadó

Grin Publishing

Súly

Méretek

148 x 210 x 3

Teljes leírás

Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2013 im Fachbereich Germanistik - Linguistik, Note: 1,0, Universität Wien (Institut für Germanistik), Veranstaltung: PS Sprachwissenschaft: Syntaktische Experimentierwerkstatt, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Nowadays humans are surrounded by Technical Languages which influence common language in many different ways (e. g. mass media as well as fictional and nonfictional literature). Therefore, the term Scientific Language and hence the term Technical Language is difficult to define and not consistently used. Although each definition fits in only one special context, technical languages (1) either exist within or besides common language, (2) differ from common language, (3) are made for communication between professionals and (4) may build a barrier of understanding. Since hindered understanding of technical languages does not only affect nonprofessionals but also professionals who do not yet possess "technical thinking" (e. g. interested people, scholars and students) the question is: Is German scientific language connected with the understandability of texts? In fact, this question also affects didactics. Based upon the fact that scientific and common language have the same linguistic levels (e. g. lexis, morphology and syntax), but some linguistic instruments of technical languages occur more or less often, the syntactic instrument of voice (diathesis) is examined prototypically. The corresponding verbalized hypothesis is: Information from texts predominantly written in active voice can be easier remembered than information from texts predominantly written in passive voice. In this case the operationalized hypothesis is: Subjects who read a text which includes more active voice sentences than passive voice sentences mark more true/false statements of a following test correctly than subjects who read a text in which it is the other way round. Referring to the operational hypothesis this study has three main components: (1) an active voice text, (2) a passive voice text and (3) a form shaped test. A total of 32 subjects took part in this study 16 of them were given the active voice text, 16 the passive voice text. For the benefit of the hypothesis those subjects who randomly got the active voice text received 8.9 percentage points better results than those who randomly got the passive voice text.

Érdekelheti

Azok a vásárlók, akik ezt a könyvet megvásárolták, a következőket is megvásárolták

Leggyakrabban keresett

Categories

Authors

Publishers

Termékek

Termékek

Leggyakrabban keresett

Categories

Authors

Publishers

Termékek

Termékek

Wie sinnvoll ist die deutsche Wissenschaftssprache fur das Textverstandnis?

Információk a könyvről

Teljes leírás

Érdekelheti

Azok a vásárlók, akik ezt a könyvet megvásárolták, a következőket is megvásárolták